They Forgot to Ask, Why? And Went Right to, How?
Last week on, #TheEndOfTheDayWithRay! I discussed the Valsoft Corporation buyout of MPS Monitor. The more I think about the many DCA technologies, the more I think about the need for organizations to continuously ask WHY?
It seems as if these DCA technologies are more intent on HOW! They are all trying to collect data and manage print equipment better. But unfortunately, these DCA technologies are forgetting the essential component of innovation. Why is their product so valuable? I will add - for how long?
Recently I heard someone define DCA as end-user customers,
Don’t Care At all. That definition sums up my thinking.
My concern is that dealers are funding these DCA IoT platforms, which seem to be construction projects for HP. And we all know how much HP loves data! So how will DCA technologies Amplify HPs Data grab?
OK, I get it. These DCA software companies are now calling themselves IoT companies. But unfortunately, they seem to struggle to define precisely what IoT means to helping print dealers transition.
All the arguments they have for dealers to use their DCA instead of the one they have. Are based on How - Theirs is better for the dealer because of this or that. My argument - is. This or that is not important enough for any dealer to replace a tool which every day becomes less important.
So, if the goal of these investment groups is to take a DCA tool built to manage print and create a new tool capable of replacing one of the many RMM tools or asset management tools of which many are funded with hundreds of millions of dollars, I think they all better start asking WHY?
Here’s my thinking:
12-year-old DCA companies being gobbled up by investment firms or distributors, as we saw with EKM earlier this year, seem to be on a mission to help HP, the most overreaching OEM in the channel, have software that will help control all the supplies going into HP devices.
Both EKM and MPS Monitor brag about their relationships with HP. My question is, what would their actual revenues be without HP?
Dealers should demand more information regarding these DCA companies before they jump onto platforms. As I said in the videos, if MPS Monitor or EKM were successful players before they were gobbled up, I believe they would have bragged about it.
Oh, and bragging about the growth of adding devices to the platform is irrelevant if there was insufficient profit. Or if all the increase was from HP. I am not sure dealers are too excited about helping HP grow in having control of the marketplace’s printers or the supplies that go into them.
In Closing: For those interested, I reached out to Nicola De Blasi of MPS Monitor; as he requested in the comments of Wednesday’s episode, he has since declined to talk.
Hopefully, dealers demand the answers and ask more questions before they switch based on this or that feature to manage print. Remember, dreams are not innovation.
Ray Stasieczko
It seems as if these DCA technologies are more intent on HOW! They are all trying to collect data and manage print equipment better. But unfortunately, these DCA technologies are forgetting the essential component of innovation. Why is their product so valuable? I will add - for how long?
Recently I heard someone define DCA as end-user customers,
Don’t Care At all. That definition sums up my thinking.
My concern is that dealers are funding these DCA IoT platforms, which seem to be construction projects for HP. And we all know how much HP loves data! So how will DCA technologies Amplify HPs Data grab?
OK, I get it. These DCA software companies are now calling themselves IoT companies. But unfortunately, they seem to struggle to define precisely what IoT means to helping print dealers transition.
All the arguments they have for dealers to use their DCA instead of the one they have. Are based on How - Theirs is better for the dealer because of this or that. My argument - is. This or that is not important enough for any dealer to replace a tool which every day becomes less important.
So, if the goal of these investment groups is to take a DCA tool built to manage print and create a new tool capable of replacing one of the many RMM tools or asset management tools of which many are funded with hundreds of millions of dollars, I think they all better start asking WHY?
Here’s my thinking:
12-year-old DCA companies being gobbled up by investment firms or distributors, as we saw with EKM earlier this year, seem to be on a mission to help HP, the most overreaching OEM in the channel, have software that will help control all the supplies going into HP devices.
Both EKM and MPS Monitor brag about their relationships with HP. My question is, what would their actual revenues be without HP?
Dealers should demand more information regarding these DCA companies before they jump onto platforms. As I said in the videos, if MPS Monitor or EKM were successful players before they were gobbled up, I believe they would have bragged about it.
Oh, and bragging about the growth of adding devices to the platform is irrelevant if there was insufficient profit. Or if all the increase was from HP. I am not sure dealers are too excited about helping HP grow in having control of the marketplace’s printers or the supplies that go into them.
In Closing: For those interested, I reached out to Nicola De Blasi of MPS Monitor; as he requested in the comments of Wednesday’s episode, he has since declined to talk.
Hopefully, dealers demand the answers and ask more questions before they switch based on this or that feature to manage print. Remember, dreams are not innovation.
Ray Stasieczko
Leave a comment
Comments will be approved before showing up.
Also in Ray's Hot Topics
The End Of The Day With Ray! Lawsuits Between Dealers! Also EX POA CEO In Another Lawsuit!
It seems as the Lawsuits Involving Dex Imaging VS. Impact Networking and DME vs. Dex Imaging show hypocrisy! I also discuss the new allegations regarding the Ex CEO of Pacific Office Automation! I did find some pictures of the event where the alleged allegations took place!
The End Of The Day With Ray! Should Kyocera Buy Xerox? Would Fujifilm Speed Up Buying Konica?
In today's episode I share some thoughts and of course NUMBERS regarding Kyocera buying Xerox! If they did our #fujifilm friends would definitely have to buy #konicaminolta We need some action at the OEM level! #kyocera has the access to boat loads of cash I strongly suggest they get aggressive in the ACTION!
ray stasieczko
Author